A comparative study to assess the Attitude of Nursing Professionals and caregivers towards the Rights the of Mentally Ill
Aim: The present study was an attempt to assess the Attitude of Nursing Professionals and caregivers towards the Rights the of Mentally Ill. The objectives were to study the socio demographic characteristics and compare the Nursing Professionals and care givers Â attitude towards the rights of mentally ill. Method: after the informed consent, 50 nursing professionals and 50 caregivers were randomly selected from the study population. The socio demographic schedule and the Professional attitude scale (David et al 2002) were used to collect the data..Discussion: The mean age of the study group was 38.33 years and the range is 23 to 60 years. Among care givers majority of them belongs to Hindu religion, studied up to higher secondary, and from rural background. About the nursing professionals majority of them belongs to Hindu religion studied up to diploma in General nursing and midwifery, and working as staff nurses with less than 10 yrs of experience. Professional attitude found that the subjects are having positive attitude towards the rights of mentally ill and there were significant differences between Nursing professionals and Caregivers in four of the six domains of patientsâ€™ perceived rights. Specifically, there were differences between groups in terms of situations that justify non treatments and forced hospitalization. Overall attitude scores obtained by both the group were found to be significant. Conclusion: Due to the chronic nature and significant impairment in decision making capacity among mentally ill patients makes both the nursing professionals and caregivers to act in accordance to the patientâ€™s needs rather than considering the patientsâ€™ rights.
Key words: attitude, care givers, nursing professionals.
Shiv Gautam , Sanjay Jain , Lalit Batra , Rajesh Sharma ,Deepti Munshi (2009), Human rights and privileges of mentally ill persons. Indian Journal of Psychiatry..82
Beck JC, Staffin RD. (1986).Patientsâ€™ competency to give informed consent to medication. Hospital and Community Psychiatry : 37: 400â€“402.
Chodoff P.(1984).Involuntary hospitalization of the mentally ill as a moral issue. American Journal of psychiatry, 141:384-389.
Ester. I, Cooker .P. (1998),Effects of a unit of Instruction in Mental Health on rural Adolescents conceptions of mental illness and attitude about seeking help in K. Emrich T.C. Thomson and G.Moore 2003, Positive attitude: an essential element for effective care of people with mental illnesses. Journal of Psychosocial Nursing and Mental health services. 41 (5): 18-25.
Halters M.J. (2004), stigma and help seeking related to depression; a study of Nursing students, Journal of Psychosocial Nursing and Mental Health Services. 42(2): 42-51.
David R et al (2002).Patientsâ€™ and staff membersâ€™ Attitudes about the Rights of Hospitalized Psychiatric patients. Psychiatric services, 53(1): 87-91.
Hugo 2001, Mental Health Workers Attitude Towards Mental Illness in Fiji, Australian Journal of Advanced Nursing, 25,3.
Morrison, Thornton (1999) Influence of southern spiritual beliefs on perceptions of mental illness. Issues Mental Health Nursing: 20(5):443-58.
Grisso T, Appelbaum PS. (1991).Mentally ill and non-mentally-ill patientsâ€™ abilities to understand informed consent disclosures for medication. Law and Human Behavior ,15:377â€“388.
Boris DS, Pope KS. (1989)Dual relationships between therapist and client: a national study of psychologists, psychiatrists, and social workers. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 283â€“293.
The Copyright Notice entered below will appear in About the Journal and in each published item's metadata. While it is up to the journal to determine the nature of its copyright agreement with authors, the Public Knowledge Project recommends the use of theÂ CREATIVE COMMONS license. To that end, it providesÂ SAMPLE COPYRIGHT NOTICE WORDING that can be cut and pasted into the space below for journals that (a) offer open access, (b) offer delayed open access, or (c) do not offer open access.